Ways of seeing

"Discuss how context has an effect on our understanding, our perception of art, of MEANING"







What interested me most about this writing, was the shift from uniqueness that the author alluded to with, "When a camera reproduces a painting, it destroys the uniqueness of its image. As a result its meaning multiplies and fragments into many meanings" (Berger, 19). This shift from originality, to personal convenience destroys the objects original intrinsic value. It is now within my means to build a doormat with a recreation of the Mona Lisa. Such recreations demonstrate that whatever inherent value such pieces once had, can easily be trumped by those who use it for their own means. So, if a person were to understand art via the context that it has inherent unique qualities, they would reach a vastly different conclusion of the piece than a person who views the item as a tool. This perceptional split is how I evaluated the rest of the book, and defined the context by which are is effected.



Further on in the book, the author explains the setting of a rather graphic painting. The painting is drawn in such a manner as to place the (male) observer in the painting either by "oust(ing) the other man, or else identify(ing) with him" (Berger, 56). Now, a believer in art may view this as an excellent depiction of the males drive for dominance and the beauty of its design. However, place a copy of this in poster form in a male 14 year old's bedroom and it will receive a much different use and appreciation. In each case, both experience a sense of meaning. Although, in the first case the meaning is derived from the art work, while the second meaning is derived for what the art can do for the person.



This dichotomy is further expressed in the reading with, "painting was also an instrument of possession" (Berger, 86). Even the items being drawn were just mere representational items of ownerships, as apposed to their own worth. This conflict of contextual significance continues through out this book, and through out art in general. Depending on the context art is placed, you will subsequently treat it as such.



As for a general reaction to the book, I can appreciate the way he structured the patriarchal response to biblical scripture. All though some may view it as politically incorrect, these opinions he shares are not new. Berger however, manages to deliver them in a way that is fresh, and provides further incite as to how a potential viewer observes/interprets the artwork. As a psychology major, that interested me the most.



Unfortunately as the book continued on, it went through a faze of repetition in which my interest of the "plot" of each painting began to fade. Regardless, John Berger delivered and excellent evaluation of art. He successfully explained a complex subject with minimal confusion.